Radeon E8950 vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.56
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK104Amethyst
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 November 2016 (9 years ago)29 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13442048
Core clock speed993 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1046 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate117.2128.0
Floating-point processing power2.812 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs112128
L1 Cache112 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.11.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 November 2016 29 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 95 Watt

GTX 760 OEM has an age advantage of 1 year.

Radeon E8950, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 78.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM and Radeon E8950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon E8950 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GeForce GTX 760 OEM
AMD Radeon E8950
Radeon E8950

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 OEM or Radeon E8950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.