ION vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.00
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK104C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 August 2013 (12 years ago)18 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores115216
Core clock speed823 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate85.253.600
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs968
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2013 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

ION, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and ION. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while ION is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
NVIDIA ION
ION

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 23 votes

Rate ION on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand or ION, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.