GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK104GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 August 2013 (12 years ago)12 July 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores115216
Core clock speed823 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate85.254.160
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs968
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.01.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2013 12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand has an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS Rev. 3, on the other hand, has 420% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand or GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.