GMA X4700MHD vs GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameGK104Montevina
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 August 2013 (12 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores115280
Core clock speed823 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate85.256.400
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs321
TMUs9610
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2013 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 760 OEM Rebrand has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4700MHD, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and GMA X4700MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while GMA X4700MHD is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
Intel GMA X4700MHD
GMA X4700MHD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate GMA X4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand or GMA X4700MHD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.