RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs GeForce GTX 750 v2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM206AD103
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 November 2015 (9 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5129728 ×2
Core clock speed1038 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1188 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate38.02510.7 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.217 TFLOPS32.69 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs32112 ×2
TMUs32304 ×2
Tensor Coresno data304 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data76 ×2
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed5012 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s576.0 GB/s ×2
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2015 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 v2 and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 v2 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GeForce GTX 750 v2
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 67 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 750 v2 or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.