Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Aggregated performance score

GTX 750 Ti
2014
4096 MB GDDR5
10.08
+125%

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by 125% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking410618
Place by popularity2150
Value for money1.07no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameGM107Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (10 years old)26 October 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$357 (2.4x MSRP)no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1020 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate43.40no data
Floating-point performance1,389 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5.4 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMIno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 750 Ti 10.08
+125%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.48

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by 125% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti 21608
+110%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 10294

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by 110% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 750 Ti 5378
+51.2%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3557

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by 51% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 4294
+80.3%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2381

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by 80% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 750 Ti 31349
+98.8%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 15770

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by 99% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 750 Ti 54
+98.9%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 27

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by 99% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+178%
18
−178%
4K21−24
+110%
10
−110%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+40%
15
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+50%
10
−50%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+41.7%
24
−41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+108%
12
−108%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+108%
13
−108%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+38.5%
26
−38.5%
Hitman 3 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+41.7%
12
−41.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+83.3%
12
−83.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+50%
12
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+54.5%
22
−54.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+350%
6
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6
−167%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+150%
10
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+92.9%
14
−92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+20%
30
−20%
Hitman 3 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+114%
7
−114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+120%
10
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+47.8%
23
−47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+220%
5
−220%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+178%
9
−178%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+92.9%
14
−92.9%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+56.5%
23
−56.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+163%
8
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Hitman 3 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Hitman 3 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+66.7%
3
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how GTX 750 Ti and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 750 Ti is 178% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

4K resolution:

  • GTX 750 Ti is 110% faster than RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 700% faster than the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000).

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 750 Ti surpassed RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in all 62 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 10.08 4.48
Recency 18 February 2014 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 5725 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1097 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.