RTX A4500 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated69
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.24
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK106GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9607168
Core clock speed1033 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1098 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate87.84369.6
Floating-point processing powerno data23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs80224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data7 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed6 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1751.3
CUDA3.08.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

GTX 750 Ti OEM has 33.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and RTX A4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 158 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 210 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.