RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.55
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK106AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9603072
Core clock speed1033 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed1098 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate87.84203.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.99 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs8096
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1751.3
CUDA3.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 158 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 42 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.