Tesla K80m vs GeForce GTX 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking412not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.23no data
Power efficiency3.33no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameGK104GK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 May 2012 (13 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072 ×22x 2496
Core clock speed915 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed1019 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate130.4 ×22x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power3.13 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×22x 48
TMUs128 ×22x 208
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 ×22x 12 GB
Memory bus width512-bit (256-bit per GPU) ×22x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s ×22x 240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMIYes (via dongle)-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 May 2012 17 November 2014

Tesla K80m has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 690 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 690 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GeForce GTX 690
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 218 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 690 or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.