ATI Radeon 7200 vs GeForce GTX 690

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4181602
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.31no data
Power efficiency3.39no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK104R100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072 ×2no data
Core clock speed915 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1019 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate130.4 ×21
Floating-point processing power3.13 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×22
TMUs128 ×26
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length279 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 ×232 MB
Memory bus width512-bit (256-bit per GPU) ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s ×25.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI-I. One Dual link DVI-D. One Mini-Displayport 1.21x VGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMIYes (via dongle)-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.21.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 690 5535
+276650%
Samples: 1219
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 May 2012 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB (4 GB per GPU) GDDR5 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 690 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 1204.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 690 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
GeForce GTX 690
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 220 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 690 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.