Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking326not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameN13E-GTXTahiti
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2012 (12 years ago)7 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26881792
Core clock speed720 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data89.60
Floating-point performanceno data2.867 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width2x 256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed3600 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2012 7 March 2013

HD 7950 Mac Edition has an age advantage of 9 months.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680M SLI and Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 680M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 21 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.