ATI FireMV 2200 vs GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGK104RV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 April 2013 (12 years ago)2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1006 MHz324 MHz
Boost clock speed1058 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)195 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate135.41.296
Floating-point processing power3.25 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1284
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length254 mm170 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz392 MBps
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s3.136 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DMS-59
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 195 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 680 Mac Edition has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200, on the other hand, has 1200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and FireMV 2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
ATI FireMV 2200
FireMV 2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition or FireMV 2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.