NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs MX250
Comparison of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250 architecture, market type and release date.
GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
48.0 billion / sec
37.97 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCI Express 2.0
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
115.2 GB / s
48.06 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250.
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
APIs supported by GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
GTX 675MX 6.64
GeForce MX250 6.75 +1.7%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
GTX 675MX 20325
GeForce MX250 22232 +9.4%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
GTX 675MX 2721
GeForce MX250 3281 +20.6%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GTX 675MX 2831
GeForce MX250 3676 +29.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
GTX 675MX 3979
GeForce MX250 4655 +17%
3DMark Vantage Performance
GTX 675MX 18950 +14.9%
GeForce MX250 16488
Unigine Heaven 3.0
GTX 675MX 41
GeForce MX250 44 +7.3%
GTX 675MX 2476
GeForce MX250 2518 +1.7%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
Wider memory bus (256 vs 64 bit)
More pipelines (960 vs 384)
Higher memory bandwidth (115.2 vs 48.06 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
SLI (Scalable Link Interface - a technology for uniting several NVIDIA GPUs processing power in one PC)
3D Vision Surround
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1.7% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (15 February 2019 vs 1 October 2012)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 100 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, GTX 675MX or MX250?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce MX250. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.