NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX vs MX250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIA GeForce MX250

General info

Comparison of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Kepler
 
Pascal
Code name
N13E-GSR
 
N17S-G1
Type
Laptop
 
Laptop
Release date
1 October 2012
 
15 February 2019

Technical specs

GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
960
 
384
CUDA cores
960
 
no data
Core clock speed
600 MHz
 
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
 
1582 MHz
Transistor count
3540 Million
 
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
 
10 Watt
Texture fill rate
48.0 billion / sec
 
37.97 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance
1,256 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
large
 
large
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
 
no data
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
 
None
SLI options
2-way
 
-

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
 
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
115.2 GB / s
 
48.06 GB / s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250.
Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
HDMI
+
 
-
HDCP
+
 
-
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
 
no data

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision
+
 
-
Optimus
+
 
-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
 
-
CUDA
+
 
-
SLI
+
 
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
 
no data
FXAA
+
 
no data
TXAA
+
 
no data
Adaptive VSync
+
 
no data
Multi Monitor
no data
 
+

API support

APIs supported by GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12 API
 
DirectX 12_1
OpenGL
4.5
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
 
no data
Vulkan
-
 
+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

GTX 675MX 6.64
GeForce MX250 6.75 +1.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

GTX 675MX 20325
GeForce MX250 22232 +9.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Score

GTX 675MX 2721
GeForce MX250 3281 +20.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

GTX 675MX 2831
GeForce MX250 3676 +29.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

GTX 675MX 3979
GeForce MX250 4655 +17%

3DMark Vantage Performance

GTX 675MX 18950 +14.9%
GeForce MX250 16488

Unigine Heaven 3.0

GTX 675MX 41
GeForce MX250 44 +7.3%

Passmark

GTX 675MX 2476
GeForce MX250 2518 +1.7%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
63 Mh/s
 
no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX

Wider memory bus (256 vs 64 bit)
More pipelines (960 vs 384)
Higher memory bandwidth (115.2 vs 48.06 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
Verde
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
3D Vision
3DTV Play
DirectX 11
SLI (Scalable Link Interface - a technology for uniting several NVIDIA GPUs processing power in one PC)
Adaptive VSync
TXAA
FXAA
HDMI
HDCP
3D Vision Surround
Optimus Support

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX250

1.7% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (15 February 2019 vs 1 October 2012)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 100 watts)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Multi Monitor

So, GTX 675MX or MX250?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX and NVIDIA GeForce MX250. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce MX250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce GTX 675MX or GeForce MX250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.