FirePro M3900 vs GeForce GTX 675M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking710not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.41no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF114Seymour
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)19 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384160
Core clock speed620 MHz750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate39.686.000
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs648
L1 Cache512 KB16 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0n/a
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity-+
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 19 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 675M has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro M3900, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 675M and FirePro M3900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 21 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 13 votes

Rate FirePro M3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M or FirePro M3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.