Radeon Xpress 200M vs GeForce GTX 670MX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	595	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	no data
GPU code name	N13E-GR	RC410
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2012 (11 years ago)	18 February 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	960	6
CUDA cores	960	no data
Core clock speed	600 MHz	2 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	350 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	48.0 billion/sec	0.67
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 670MX and Radeon Xpress 200M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	0 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	67.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	2.0
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 October 2012	18 February 2005
Chip lithography	28 nm	130 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---