Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
AMD Radeon HD 7870 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Combined performance score
GeForce GTX 670 outperforms Radeon HD 7870 by 15% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 347 | 371 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 3.41 | 2.70 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | GCN (2011−2017) |
GPU code name | GK104 | Pitcairn XT |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 10 May 2012 (11 years old) | 5 March 2012 (12 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $412.83 |
Current price | $22 (0.1x MSRP) | $200 (0.5x MSRP) |
GTX 670 has 26% better value for money than HD 7870.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | 1280 |
CUDA cores | 1344 | no data |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 2800 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 175 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion/sec | 80.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | 241 mm |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bus width | 256-bit GDDR5 | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Multi monitor support | 4 displays | no data |
Eyefinity | no data | + |
HDMI | + | + |
HDCP | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray | + | no data |
3D Gaming | + | no data |
3D Vision | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GTX 670 outperforms Radeon HD 7870 by 15% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GeForce GTX 670 outperforms Radeon HD 7870 by 15% in Passmark.
Unigine Heaven 4.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.
Benchmark coverage: 1%
GeForce GTX 670 outperforms Radeon HD 7870 by 27% in Unigine Heaven 4.0.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 95−100
+13.1%
| 84
−13.1%
|
Full HD | 75−80
+13.6%
| 66
−13.6%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 13.77 | 11.96 |
Recency | 10 May 2012 | 5 March 2012 |
Cost | $399 | $412.83 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 175 Watt |
The GeForce GTX 670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.