ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit vs GeForce GTX 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking782not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.34no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGK107R350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed835 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate30.403.040
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs328
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s21.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 47 Watt

GTX 660M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO 256-bit, on the other hand, has 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 239 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660M or Radeon 9800 PRO 256-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.