ATI Radeon 9250 vs GeForce GTX 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7711600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.31no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGK107RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (13 years ago)1 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed835 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.400.96
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660M 1452
+72500%
Samples: 1564
ATI 9250 2
Samples: 123

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30no data
Full HD35no data
1200p38no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Fortnite 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 89 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Fortnite 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 16−18 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GTX 660M has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660M and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9250 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GeForce GTX 660M
ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 232 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 55 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660M or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.