ATI Radeon X700 PRO AGP vs GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1023not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGK107RV410
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2013 (12 years ago)1 September 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed950 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million120 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate30.403.400
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs328
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz472 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s15.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2013 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 33 Watt

GTX 660M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X700 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has 51.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and Radeon X700 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X700 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
ATI Radeon X700 PRO AGP
Radeon X700 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X700 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition or Radeon X700 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.