Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs GTX 660 OEM
Combined performance score
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms GTX 660 OEM by 980% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 695 | 125 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.08 | 44.66 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Turing (2018−2021) |
GPU code name | GK104 | N18E-G2R |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 22 August 2012 (11 years old) | 2 April 2020 (3 years old) |
Current price | $481 | $812 |
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has 55725% better value for money than GTX 660 OEM.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1152 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | 1155 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 | 184.8 |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 660 OEM and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 11000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | + | no data |
G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 9−10
−1078%
| 106
+1078%
|
1440p | 6−7
−1117%
| 73
+1117%
|
4K | 4−5
−1075%
| 47
+1075%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 3.34 | 36.07 |
Recency | 22 August 2012 | 2 April 2020 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 80 Watt |
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.