650 Ti Boost vs 760

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 760
12.36
+42.9%

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 43% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking364459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.250.97
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104GK106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 June 2013 (10 years old)26 March 2013 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $169
Current price$136 (0.5x MSRP)$285 (1.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760 has 338% better value for money than GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152768
CUDA cores1152768
Core clock speed980 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1033 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt134 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °C97 °C
Texture fill rate94.1 billion/sec62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance2,378 gflops1,585 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)9.5" (24.1 cm)
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinOne 6-pin
SLI options++

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s144.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displays4 Displays
HDMI++
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming++
3D Vision++
PhysX+no data
3D Vision Live++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.36
+42.9%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.65

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 43% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760 4792
+42.9%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 3354

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 43% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760 5959
+35.7%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 36% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 760 14234
+52%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 9364

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 52% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 760 13889
+58.1%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 8785

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 58% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 760 10683
+56.9%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 6809

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 57% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 760 44
+63%
GTX 650 Ti Boost 27

760 outperforms 650 Ti Boost by 63% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD67
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hitman 3 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

This is how GTX 760 and GTX 650 Ti Boost compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 760 is 48.9% faster than GTX 650 Ti Boost

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 12.36 8.65
Recency 25 June 2013 26 March 2013
Cost $249 $169
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 134 Watt

The GeForce GTX 760 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1884 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 325 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.