AeroBox GPU vs GeForce GTX 645 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Kryptos
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 April 2013 (11 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores576896
Core clock speed824 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate39.5555.16
Floating-point processing power0.9492 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length147 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 April 2013 13 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 645 OEM has 53.8% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 645 OEM and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 645 OEM is a desktop card while AeroBox GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 75 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 645 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.