ATI Radeon 9200 LE vs GeForce GTX 580M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M with Radeon 9200 LE, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.40
+53900%

GTX 580M outperforms ATI 9200 LE by a whopping 53900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6181535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.720.02
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF114RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 May 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed620 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate39.681.000
Floating-point processing power0.9523 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580M 5.40
+53900%
ATI 9200 LE 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 580M 2074
+103600%
ATI 9200 LE 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p46-0−1
Full HD55-0−1
1200p42-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
Valorant 16−18 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1
Valorant 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 85−90 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 0−1
Valorant 16−18 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
World of Tanks 35−40 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 14−16 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.40 0.01
Recency 28 June 2011 1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 28 Watt

GTX 580M has a 53900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 LE, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 580M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 LE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580M is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 LE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GeForce GTX 580M
ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Radeon 9200 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.