ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 580M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5111605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.17no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (15 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682
Core clock speed620 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speedno data180 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.37
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX117.0
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p68no data
Full HD93no data
1200p81no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−33 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
Valorant 90−95
+296%
21−24
−296%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+1489%
9−10
−1489%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Dota 2 65−70
+886%
7−8
−886%
Far Cry 5 30−33 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Valorant 90−95
+296%
21−24
−296%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Dota 2 65−70
+886%
7−8
−886%
Far Cry 5 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Valorant 90−95
+296%
21−24
−296%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data
Valorant 45−50 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 580M SLI is 1950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 580M SLI surpassed ATI IGP 340M in all 19 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2011 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

GTX 580M SLI has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 580M SLI and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 580M SLI or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.