Radeon HD 8750A vs GeForce GTX 580

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking408not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.08no data
Power efficiency3.37no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGF110Mars
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 November 2010 (14 years ago)2 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed772 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)244 Watt45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate49.4114.40
Floating-point processing power1.581 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs6424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz (4008 data rate)1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.4 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2010 2 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 244 Watt 45 Watt

GTX 580 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD 8750A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 442.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 580 and Radeon HD 8750A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8750A is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 465 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.