H200 SXM 141 GB vs GeForce GTX 580
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 455 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.75 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.48 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Hopper (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | GH100 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 November 2010 (14 years ago) | 18 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 16896 |
| Core clock speed | 772 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1980 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 80,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 700 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 49.41 | 1,045 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.581 TFLOPS | 66.91 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 24 |
| TMUs | 64 | 528 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 528 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 33 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 50 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | SXM Module |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM3e |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 141 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 6144 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) | 1593 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB/s | 4.89 TB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 9.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 November 2010 | 18 November 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 141 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 700 Watt |
GTX 580 has 186.9% lower power consumption.
H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 9300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 580 and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop graphics card while H200 SXM 141 GB is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
