GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs GTX 580
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 456 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.74 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.48 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | GT200B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 November 2010 (14 years ago) | 17 June 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 240 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 772 MHz | 648 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 315 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 49.41 | 51.84 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.581 TFLOPS | 0.7085 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 275 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 512 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) | 1152 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB/s | 147.5 GB/s ×2 |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 November 2010 | 17 June 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 315 Watt |
GTX 580 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 29.1% lower power consumption.
GTX 285 X2, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
