ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX vs GeForce GTX 560M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking803not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.13no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGF116R350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2011 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed775 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt94 Watt
Texture fill rate24.803.040
Floating-point processing power0.5952 TFLOPSno data
ROPs248
TMUs328
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB128 MB
Memory bus widthUp to 192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz680 MBps
Memory bandwidthUp to 60 GB/s21.76 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 94 Watt

GTX 560M has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 25.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560M and Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
GeForce GTX 560M
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 91 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560M or Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.