Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce GTX 560M

Place in performance ranking	704	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.11	10.10
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N12E-GS	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	30 May 2011 (12 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,299
Current price	$1198	$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 9082% better value for money than GTX 560M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4608
CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	775 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.8 billion/sec	509.8
Floating-point performance	595.2 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560M and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options	2-way	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	24 GB
Memory bus width	Up to 192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 60 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
3D Gaming	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560M 3.21

RTX 6000 48.73
+1418%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 560M by 1418% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560M 1244

RTX 6000 18872
+1417%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 560M by 1417% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 560M 4723

RTX 6000 138352
+2829%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GTX 560M by 2829% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	31 −1352%	450−500 +1352%
Full HD	39 −1310%	550−600 +1310%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−1400%

90−95
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −1362%	190−200 +1362%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −1400%	150−160 +1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −1362%	190−200 +1362%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −1400%	150−160 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1344%	130−140 +1344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Hitman 3	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −1400%	150−160 +1400%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1400%	75−80 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Hitman 3	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −1400%	90−95 +1400%

This is how GTX 560M and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 is 1352% faster than GTX 560M in 900p
RTX 6000 is 1310% faster than GTX 560M in 1080p

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	3.21	48.73
Recency	30 May 2011	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	24 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	260 Watt