GeForce2 Go 200 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.48no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameN12E-GSNV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)6 February 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed775 MHz143 MHz
Number of transistorsno data20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.57
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX117.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2011 6 February 2001
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 2 Watt

GTX 560M SLI has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go 200, on the other hand, has 4900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560M SLI and GeForce2 Go 200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200
GeForce2 Go 200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 Go 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.