HD Graphics 3000 vs GeForce GTX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 with HD Graphics 3000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
7.09
+974%

GTX 560 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 974% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5171148
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Gen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)
GPU code nameGF114Sandy Bridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$76 (0.4x MSRP)$476

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 560 and HD Graphics 3000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores33612
Core clock speed810 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million995 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattunknown
Maximum GPU temperature99 °Cno data
Texture fill rate45.3613.80
Floating-point performance1,088.6 gflops20.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560 and HD Graphics 3000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length8.25" (21 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.13.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 7.09
+974%
HD Graphics 3000 0.66

GeForce GTX 560 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 974% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560 2740
+979%
HD Graphics 3000 254

GeForce GTX 560 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 979% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+963%
8
−963%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

This is how GTX 560 and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 is 963% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.09 0.66
Recency 17 May 2011 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm

The GeForce GTX 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1004 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 2234 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.