UHD Graphics vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti with UHD Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
7.96
+42.4%

GTX 560 Ti outperforms UHD Graphics by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking521607
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.82no data
Power efficiency3.2338.57
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameGF114Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 January 2011 (13 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed823 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate52.6712.00
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.96
+42.4%
UHD Graphics 5.59

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 Ti 3059
+42.2%
UHD Graphics 2151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Full HD63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Elden Ring 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Elden Ring 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Fortnite 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+60%
40−45
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
World of Tanks 120−130
+50%
80−85
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+60%
40−45
−60%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Elden Ring 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
World of Tanks 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Elden Ring 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

This is how GTX 560 Ti and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti is 58% faster in 900p
  • GTX 560 Ti is 58% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.96 5.59
Recency 25 January 2011 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 10 Watt

GTX 560 Ti has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1600% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 831 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6717 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.