Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking580not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.62no data
Power efficiency3.32no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGF114NV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2011 (14 years ago)16 July 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed823 MHz220 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate52.670.88 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322 ×2
TMUs644 ×2
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1002 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s5.312 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x LFH60
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2011 16 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 18 Watt

GTX 560 Ti has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 844.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 897 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti or Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.