Quadro NVS 280 SD vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5791599
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.63no data
Power efficiency3.33no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGF114NV18 C1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2011 (14 years ago)31 May 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed823 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate52.671.000
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs644
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DMS-59
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 Ti 3081
+153950%
Samples: 9998
NVS 280 SD 2
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63no data
Full HD65no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Dota 2 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data
Valorant 75−80 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2011 31 May 2005
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 10 Watt

GTX 560 Ti has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 SD, on the other hand, has 1600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Quadro NVS 280 SD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 894 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti or Quadro NVS 280 SD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.