Radeon RX 6400 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 295 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 52.37 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.50 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | GF114 | Navi 24 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 19 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $159 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 ×2 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1923 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2321 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | 5,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 53 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 54.40 ×2 | 111.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.306 TFLOPS ×2 | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2 | 48 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Length | 292 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB ×2 | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit ×2 | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1002 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB/s ×2 | 128.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | + | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 January 2011 | 19 January 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 53 Watt |
RX 6400 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 220.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 and Radeon RX 6400. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
