Radeon R4 (Beema) vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.1 (2014)
GPU code nameGF114Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 January 2011 (14 years ago)29 April 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×2128
Core clock speed850 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate54.40 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×2no data
TMUs64 ×2no data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length292 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width256 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2011 29 April 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R4 (Beema) has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 and Radeon R4 (Beema). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R4 (Beema) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R4 (Beema)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 74 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 or Radeon R4 (Beema), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.