FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated656
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.76
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF114Cayman
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2011 (14 years ago)24 May 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384 ×21280
Core clock speed850 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate54.40 ×258.00
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS ×21.856 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×232
TMUs64 ×280
L1 Cache512 KB320 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length292 mm279 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×22 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s ×2160 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2011 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 151 Watt

FirePro V7900 has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 12.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 and FirePro V7900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V7900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
AMD FirePro V7900
FirePro V7900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 18 votes

Rate FirePro V7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 or FirePro V7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.