Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011
1280 MB GDDR5
8.16
+49.2%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 49% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking475571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.400.78
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameGF110Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 November 2011 (12 years old)26 October 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data
Current price$624 (2.2x MSRP)$475
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 11 has 95% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti 448.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448704
Core clock speed732 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1240 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate40.9961.60
Floating-point performance1,311.7 gflops1,760 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1280 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 448 8.16
+49.2%
RX Vega 11 5.47

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 49% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 560 Ti 448 4210
+20.5%
RX Vega 11 3494

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 20% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+42.9%
28
−42.9%
1440p8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%
4K16−18
+33.3%
12
−33.3%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 8.16 5.47
Recency 29 November 2011 26 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB System Shared
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 65 Watt

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 11 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1676 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.