Radeon R7 M365 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking575not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.50no data
Power efficiency2.79no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF110Litho
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 November 2011 (14 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448384
Core clock speed732 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data960 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.9923.04
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPSno data
ROPs408
TMUs5624
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIno data
Eyefinity-+
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.1Not Listed
VulkanN/A-
Mantle-+
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 November 2011 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R7 M365 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon R7 M365. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or Radeon R7 M365, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.