ATI Radeon HD 5770 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6750 6770 6770 Green Edition 5670 640SP Edition 5750 5770 5770 Mac Edition 5770 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon HD 5770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011, $289
1280 MB GDDR5, 210 Watt
7.64
+86.3%

560 Ti 448 outperforms HD 5770 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
ATI HD 5770 HD 5770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking583745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.520.79
Power efficiency2.812.93
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF110Juniper
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 November 2011 (14 years ago)13 October 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 560 Ti 448 has 92% better value for money than ATI HD 5770.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448800
Core clock speed732 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt108 Watt
Texture fill rate40.9934.00
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS1.36 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs5640
L1 Cache896 KB80 KB
L2 Cache640 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm208 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB1 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+66.7%
24
−66.7%
Full HD90−95
+80%
50
−80%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.21
−1%
3.18
+1%
  • GTX 560 Ti 448 and ATI HD 5770 have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 560 Ti 448 and ATI HD 5770 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti 448 is 67% faster in 900p
  • GTX 560 Ti 448 is 80% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.64 4.10
Recency 29 November 2011 13 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 108 Watt

GTX 560 Ti 448 has a 86% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI HD 5770, on the other hand, has 94% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5770 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 260X Radeon R7 260X
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
vs
HD 7750 Radeon HD 7750
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 360 Radeon R7 360
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
HD Graphics 2500 HD Graphics 2500
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
9800 GTX GeForce 9800 GTX
GTX 670 GeForce GTX 670
vs
UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 615
GT 640 OEM GeForce GT 640 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GTX 460 v2 GTX 460 v2
vs
GTX 555 OEM GTX 555 OEM
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
8400 GS PCI GeForce 8400 GS PCI
GTX 560 GeForce GTX 560
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
GTX 560 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
vs
GeForce 610M GeForce 610M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 31 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 774 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or Radeon HD 5770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.