ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking570not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.49no data
Power efficiency2.77no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF110M74
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 November 2011 (13 years ago)14 May 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44840
Core clock speed732 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.992.400
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS0.048 TFLOPS
ROPs404
TMUs564
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB256 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 November 2011 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

GTX 560 Ti 448 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.