GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.48no data
Power efficiency2.77no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF110GM204
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 November 2011 (14 years ago)9 January 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4481024
Core clock speed732 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.9973.60
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs5664
L1 Cache896 KB384 KB
L2 Cache640 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.05.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 November 2011 9 January 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

GTX 965M 4 GB has an age advantage of 3 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB
GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.