Radeon Sky 900 vs GeForce GTX 485M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking643not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.33no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF104Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)27 March 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584 ×2
Core clock speed1150 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate36.80106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs64112 ×2
L1 Cache512 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0PCIe 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s480 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 485M has 200% lower power consumption.

Sky 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Sky 900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
AMD Radeon Sky 900
Radeon Sky 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 485M or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.