ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce GTX 485M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6501604
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.34no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGF104RV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (15 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1150 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate36.800.55
Floating-point processing power0.8832 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs643
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 485M 2359
+117850%
Samples: 24
ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p48no data
Full HD66no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Fortnite 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
Valorant 65−70 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Fortnite 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 5 16−18 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Valorant 65−70 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Valorant 65−70 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 60−65 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 20−22 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2011 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 485M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 334.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 485M and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 485M
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 485M or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.