MX150 vs GTX 485M SLI

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking437551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money8.331.26
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A1N17S-G1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years old)16 May 2017 (6 years old)
Current price$149 $1049
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 485M SLI has 561% better value for money than GeForce MX150.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed575 MHz1468 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1532 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt25 Watt (10 - 25 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rateno data24.91
Floating-point performanceno data1,127 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 485M SLI and GeForce MX150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.2.131
CUDAno data6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 485M SLI
9.21
+56.6%

GTX 485M SLI outperforms MX150 by 57% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M SLI 24830
+126%
GeForce MX150 10992

GTX 485M SLI outperforms MX150 by 126% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 485M SLI 5334
+18.7%
GeForce MX150 4494

GTX 485M SLI outperforms MX150 by 19% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p89
+61.8%
55−60
−61.8%
Full HD103
+281%
27
−281%
1440p35−40
+45.8%
24
−45.8%
4K27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
19
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−25.8%
39
+25.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+13.6%
22
−13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+27.3%
11
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+35.3%
17
−35.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+28%
25
−28%
Hitman 3 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+50%
12
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+14.3%
14
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+46.2%
13
−46.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Battlefield 5 30−35
−3.2%
32
+3.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+257%
7
−257%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+43.8%
16
−43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+52.4%
21
−52.4%
Hitman 3 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+81.8%
11
−81.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
19
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+45.5%
11
−45.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+171%
7
−171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+19.2%
26
−19.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+64.3%
14
−64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+60%
15
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+129%
14
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+72.7%
11
−72.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Hitman 3 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how GTX 485M SLI and GeForce MX150 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 485M SLI is 61.8% faster than GeForce MX150

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 485M SLI is 281% faster than GeForce MX150

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 485M SLI is 45.8% faster than GeForce MX150

4K resolution:

  • GTX 485M SLI is 42.1% faster than GeForce MX150

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 485M SLI is 600% faster than the GeForce MX150.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX150 is 25.8% faster than the GTX 485M SLI.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 485M SLI is ahead in 61 test (94%)
  • GeForce MX150 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.21 5.88
Recency 6 January 2011 16 May 2017
Memory bus width 256 64
Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 384
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 25 Watt

The GeForce GTX 485M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
GeForce GTX 485M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1481 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.