ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo vs GeForce GTX 485M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking549not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.42no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameN11E-GTX-A1Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (15 years ago)1 March 1997 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed575 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.08
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB4 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX116.0
OpenGLno data1.1
OpenCLno dataNone

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2011 1 March 1997
Chip lithography 40 nm 350 nm

GTX 485M SLI has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 485M SLI and 3D Rage PRO Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 485M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 485M SLI or 3D Rage PRO Turbo, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.