ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 PRO IGP vs GeForce GTX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking493not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.43no data
Power efficiency3.00no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGF100RS350
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 March 2010 (16 years ago)23 June 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million76 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate42.060.6
Floating-point processing power1.345 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs602
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1848 MHz (3696 data rate)System Shared
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.21.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2010 23 June 2003
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GTX 480 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480 and Mobility Radeon 9100 PRO IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon 9100 PRO IGP is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 252 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon 9100 PRO IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480 or Mobility Radeon 9100 PRO IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.