Radeon R7 M265DX vs GeForce GTX 480 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1102
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF100Topaz
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data12 October 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed527 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data940 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Wattno data
Texture fill rate33.7322.56
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs6424
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length292 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2.8 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

R7 M265DX has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and Radeon R7 M265DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 M265DX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon R7 M265DX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 or Radeon R7 M265DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.