Radeon 610M vs GeForce GTX 480 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated793
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameGF100RDNA 2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512128
Core clock speed527 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate33.7315.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4864 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs648
Ray Tracing Coresno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length292 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2.8 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 610M has a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 and Radeon 610M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 is a desktop card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 669 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.