H3C XG310 vs GeForce GTX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking575not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.22no data
Power efficiency2.70no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGF100DG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 March 2010 (15 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448768 ×4
Core clock speed607 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt300 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.0552.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power1.089 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs4024 ×4
TMUs5648 ×4
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache640 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1674 MHz (3348 data rate)2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth133.9 GB/s68.26 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2010 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 470 has 39.5% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 470 and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 470 is a desktop graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
GeForce GTX 470
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 361 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 470 or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.